Showing posts with label PhD. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PhD. Show all posts

Completed my VIVA!!!!

I just finished my viva and am thrilled to share I got exactly the outcome I was hoping for - a “B” with ONE month of “enhancements”!!! (A full “A” with no revisions is almost unheard of in the UK.) So, YAY!!!!! The examination team will formalize the feedback and send me revision notes in about a week, then I’ll have a month to turn them around. Once my “enhancements” are approved, I will receive my doctoral letter. So, I’m about 6 weeks away from being “Dr. E” now!!!! WHOOHOOOO!!!!!!! 😊

MANY thanks to my amazing supervisors, Dr Maureen Farrell, Dr Rob Maslen, and Prof Bob Davis. I SO enjoyed our years of working so closely together - I am a better person for knowing all of you! Thank you also to Kay Livingston, our convenor; to my internal examiner, Prof James Conroy; and to my external examiner, Dr Vicky Macleroy. My PhD was a beast (a 90,000-word thesis with a 90,000-word novel attached as an appendix), so I so appreciate their time, interest, and in-depth questions!

The viva was tough, stressful, but also so much fun! I loved answering those hard questions about this topic that I've studied so deeply for three years now: "Tricksters, Witches, and Warriors: A Feminist Experiment in Rewriting a Patriarchal Narrative in Children's Fantasy Literature." Once the pain of academic childbirth (*ahem*) wears off, I'll be writing more about it all for conferences and journals. So, stay tuned!

Turned in my PhD Thesis!

Thursday evening I hit "send" on my PhD thesis (called a dissertation in the US). In the end, the title was: "Tricksters, Witches, and Warriors: A Feminist Experiment in Rewriting a Patriarchal Narrative in Children's Fantasy Literature." It is 88K words long (including the bibliography), it also has a 90K-word novel that accompanies it as an enormous appendix. It's already been sent out to the internal and external examiners, who will have it anywhere from six weeks to 3 months. Then we'll schedule my VIVA, where I'll defend my work. (VIVA is short for "viva-voce" or "oral examination.") It's extremely rare that a thesis passes a VIVA without suggestions for changes, so realistically, I can expect to be given another three months (give or take) to get those completed. THEN, I will receive my Doctorate!
     The whole thing has taken me three years, so far; while the last two months have been serious crunch time. I met with my supervisors every week, sometimes twice a week. (This was usually a joy, as I love and respect my supervisors dearly - Maureen Farrell and Bob Davis of the University of Glasgow.) But the writing was intense to say the least. My hand hurts, my head hurts. Honestly, I am seriously spent.
     With it out the door, I am suddenly faced with a new thing in my life - free time. What's that? I'm sure I will fill the void with some other project soon. But for now, I'm finding it hard to focus and have turned into a complete and utter slug. It's part of why, in the service of self-preservation, I need to step back from my blog for a bit—if anything to just let my hand heal. I also feel like I'm looking UP for the first time in months. Thank goodness my friends have stuck by me through this; because I haven't been terribly present of late.
     So, while I already have some ideas cooking for my next steps, I need to give myself a little down time to refill my coffers. I hope you, dear readers, will stick around for when I get back to my normal activities. Until then, I wish you peace and love for the new year, in which I will gain a brand new title!

I do like my Facebook avatar, I think it's a darned good likeness. :)

Video: Terri Windling, "The Power of Story: re-creating the world through fantasy", Glasgow, 10 May 2019

Remember when I told you about the Symposium on Fantasy and the Fantastic in Glasgow? Well, Terri Windling's wonderful talk is now available online from the new Centre for Fantasy and the Fantastic. Click the image to listen.

PhD Crunch Time!

I am now in the last four weeks of writing up my PhD - crunch time! It’s hard to believe that I’m finally to this moment after so many years of work. As such, every spare moment I have is going towards edits. It’s been a silver lining of the furlough that I’ve been able to use these days to help me in this endeavor.

Here’s how the timeline breaks down… I will submit on December 18th. My thesis (called a dissertation in the US) will go to internal and external examiners for up to three months. Then I will defend my thesis in an intense meeting, called a viva (which will be online because of Covid). It’s likely I’ll be given a month to do some suggested edits, at the end of which, I will receive my doctoral letter. I’ve had amazing and capable supervisors throughout my process, so have every reason to believe this should occur without hiccups. Graduation ceremony would normally be a walk through old campus followed by bagpipes in late June/early July. I don’t know if that will be possible because of the virus, but all my digits are crossed! I plan to purchase some very nice ceremonial robes either way!

A VIVA Workshop

I'm actually getting rather close to the end of my PhD, if you can believe it (I have a hard time believing it)! So, it was time to take the VIVA workshop with tips and information about defending my thesis (a PhD thesis is called a dissertation in the US). I've been meeting with my supervisors every Thursday for several weeks now, going over edits of about twenty to thirty pages each go-round, which I then complete over the weekends. The plan is to submit my completed thesis in late November if all goes well. (One of my supervisors got Covid, so things like that might come into play. He's on the mend, thank goodness!)
     Come time, not only will I submit my 90,000 word thesis and the craft-portion of my thesis, a 90,000 word novel, but my printed versions will go off to three examiners (one internal to the University of Glasgow and two external examiners). They'll get two to three months to read through and make notes. Those examiners will then quiz me for several hours in what is called the VIVA. This is where you verbally defend your thesis, out loud, in front of people - no pressure. (This would usually happen in person, but will be online because of Covid.) Which brings me back to the workshop...
Two friends who I hadn't seen in ages were in attendance, which was a treat. (Hi Laurie and Saskia!) And I got to play the role of a mock-examiner, learning about two more fascinating theses in the process. What a smart group of people from all over the world. We talked about concerns (online tech was a big one), deadlines, what to expect, you name it. We all learned a ton and I'm so glad I was able to attend! (With teaching full-time, there was no guarantee.)
     So, am I ready? Hm. Let's just say I have a better idea of what to expect. I'm not sure I'll ever truly be ready! But I think that was my biggest take-away. There is no such thing as a perfect thesis, so embrace what you've accomplished and just run with it!

Online Gatherings

I so miss my friends all over the world. Heck, I miss my friends in my own back yard right now! But sometimes, I get the wonderful opportunity to catch up. I met with former office-mates from the University of Glasgow recently. Yaxi and Hyab are still in Scotland (originally from China and Eritrea), while Rebecca is back in Canada, and I'm in the US, of course. I am grateful for technology making this gathering possible. I love these guys.
I also got to meet with fellow classmates in the Children's Literature program at the UoG. Countries represented are Pakistan, Malaysia, Norway, Scotland, England, Mexico, and the US. Heidi "Sister" Lawrence has been especially helpful to me during my PhD - we've become late-night texting buddies when the writing feels overwhelming.
Truly, if there had to be a pandemic, at least technology has kept us together. Although, I think when this is all over, we're going to value our in-person connections more than ever!

Witches!

Along with drawing Tricksters for my PhD, I've also been drawing Witches - as I feel that many/most witches are indeed Tricksters, just labelled negatively by a patriarchal society - PAH! Recognize any of these? (Ninevenn isn't finished yet.)
I need lots more witches - help me remember them all - name some witches in my comments! :)

Tricksters!

I've been drawing representations of Tricksters for my PhD. I started sketching some of these out during my MFA, so I've wanted to do these for a long time. Of course, there are tons of Tricksters, so this is just a small start. But I feel like doing these will pull my illustration side into my studies. Do you know the stories behind these Tricksters?

Poppies and Paradigms

In my continuing effort to share my PhD experience, I bring you poppies.
I headed to Glasgow today to attend a guest lecture by Professor Bruce Wilson, the Director of the European Union Centre at RMIT University (Australia). He talked about "Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals in Asia Pacific: A Role for the EU?" And dang, was it fascinating!
      His perspectives on Brexit, the EU, and UN on handling world issues was illuminating, as he discussed organizations such as the EEAS, AZIAN, or ASEM. He discussed the 17 Sustainable Development Goals of his and other organizations which the EU and UN try to uphold as their driving reasons for being. It is so good to see countries coming together trying to make a difference on such a world-wide scale.
I was full of questions, and wonder how organizations I work with can be encouraged to adopt these same "SDG"s. It’s a good thing to be aware of, and a good thing to work towards in a myriad of endeavours, studies and practices.
After the lecture, I rushed to my supervisory meeting with Professors Maureen Farrell and Bob Davis. They are both absolutely brilliant and we have these fantastic conversations about mythology, motifs, symbolism, Celtic history, Slavic folklore, Jungian archetypes and whether or not they bypass the gifts of human culture by trying to figure out underlying rules that homogenise us all. We talk about books and authors.
For example: John Mann and Adrianne Mayer’s thoughts on Amazons; George Dumezil and his disciples on Slavic and Celtic traditions; Foucault’s Pendulum; Bob Davis’ critical paper on Jungian philosophy; The Dragon of Og; Andrew Lang’s fairy tale origins; Ronald Hutton’s approach to pagan studies
And we talked about academics - their viewpoints, both complementary and dissenting, in contexts such as 'at what point does Endo-European tradition underlie Scottish tradition?', and how 'talking about changes I want to make to my novel will give my thesis context.' In one hour, I took three pages of wonderful, inspired, inspiring notes.
I just adore these meetings. We sit together and go off the rails with our brainiac and geekified ideas, theories, and new paradigms. Truly, what could be more fun than that!?

I took the photos of these lovely poppies (as big as dinner plates) in front of the English/Scottish lit offices on the way to my meetings.

PhD: Thoughts on Lolly Willowes

I keep promising to write more about my PhD studies, so here I go. Terri Windling recently wrote an article called "Hen Wives, Spinsters, and Lolly Willowes". I had never read Lolly Willowes, and as the title of my PhD thesis is "Tricksters, Witches, and Warriors: Rewriting a Patriarchal Narrative in Children's Literature", I had to check it out!
     Lolly Willowes was written by Sylvia Townsend Warner and was first published in 1926. Most recently it was published by Virago and remains a feminist classic to this day.
     On its face, it is the story of the evolution of a spinster into a witch. However, it is a thinly veiled cover for a woman finally coming into her own agency, her own voice, authority, validity, etc. She does not find her empowerment through a man or through marriage. (Although, I would argue that her allegiance to The Devil could be thought of as this marriage or deferral to a patriarchal authority.) Her discovery comes through a solitary exploration of nature, simplicity, and the disregard of social expectations. As Warner writes: "It is best as one grows older to strip oneself of possessions, to shed oneself downward like a tree, to be almost wholly earth before one dies" (Warner, 2012, p106).
     And while the story labels Lolly's self-discovery as the path of a witch, what woman hasn't come into her own agency in mid-life, following a similar path? Think of the Red Hat Society, Steele Magnolias, or any number of explorations of women past their 'prime', embracing their worth and shouting out to the world, "I don't care what you think!"
     These journeys of self-empowerment were once taboo and were regarded as women led astray. When in actuality, it was intelligent women disregarding the legitimacy of patriarchy and claiming their own paths. The only danger that lies in that exercise is the light shed on the patriarchy that would keep women subjugated, obedient, and silent. In our modern world, this exercise is called enlightenment, or feminism. Yet in Lolly's world, it was called witchcraft.
     There was the henwife who "held their destinies in the crook of her arm, and hatched the future in her apron" (Warner, 2012, p146); the spaewife who "sat on a creepie and stared at the smouldering peas till her eyes were red and unseeing" (Warner, 2012, p147); or the witch, of course. Of women who become witches, Lolly said, "Women have such vivid imaginations, and lead such dull lives. Their pleasure in life is so soon over; they are so dependent upon others, and their dependence so soon becomes a nuisance" (p234). Truly, who at this 'coming of age' hasn't felt the creeping on of invisibility, of the impotence of societal purpose, or the urge to throw care to the wind, when society seems to give so little care back? Lolly says that witches are simply "women living and growing old, as common as blackberries, and as unregarded" (p234). . . "And all the time being thrust further down into dullness when the one thing all women hate is to be thought dull" (p235). . . "they are like trees towards the end of summer, heavy and dusty, and nobody finds their leaves surprising, or notices them till they fall off" (p236).
     Indeed, we are supposed to go quietly into the night. Society doesn't like vocal women who take control of their own fates.
     It is represented again and again in my studies. Women demonstrating the same traits that are regarded as positive in male figures are regarded as negative in females. Male figures with certain characteristics are called tricksters, females with those same characteristics are called witches. Women are denigrated for showing characteristics of self-empowerment, self-actualization, or influence.
     Lolly accepts her evolution into witchdom and embraces it as a change that brings her closer to nature - externally and internally - and brings her a great sense of peace in that she feels she is no longer existing to serve others (although, again, one could make the argument about her serving The Devil). It's the patriarchal framing of 'undesirable' traits as negative, alternative, or evil.
     And yet, by the end of the book, Lolly is most at peace embracing her most 'undesirable' characteristics, for that is when she truly feels her POWER. Because, as Lolly says, "Some [women] may get religion, then they're all right, I expect. But for the others, for so many, what can there be but witchcraft? . . . Even if other people still find them quite safe and usual, and go on poking with them, they know in their hearts how dangerous, how incalculable, how extraordinary they are" (p237). . . "to have a life of one's own" (p239).

Have you read Lolly Willowes? I'd love to read your thoughts below!

Warner, S.T., Waters, S., 2012. Lolly Willowes. Virago, London.

#KidLitWomen - Rewriting the Cultural Narrative

Starting March 1st, we’re celebrating Women’s History month with 31 days of posts focused on improving the climate for social and gender equality in the children’s and teens’ industry. Join in the conversation here or on Twitter at #kidlitwomen. Access all the #KidlitWomen posts this month on our KidLitWomen FaceBook page at https://www.facebook.com/kidlitwomen.

Artwork from my picture book, Lula's Brew (Dulemba, 2012).

Rewriting the Cultural Narrative
by Elizabeth Dulemba

The #MeToo movement has brought the need for gender-based social reform to the forefront yet again. (Which wave of feminism are we up to now?) It’s a trend that has only just begun to take hold in children's literature as statistics clarify a pattern of underrepresentation and subjugation of females in the first books children read. It's a pattern that is not only damaging but dangerous to modern society, because, as Marina Warner said in Once Upon a Time: A Short History of Fairy Tale, “…what we discover in books or other media when we are young imprints us—stories communicate values, like myths, and shape our understanding of the world” (Warner, 2016, p172).

A recent promotional video by the creators of Rebel Girls revealed a disturbing lack of representation of females and female agency in children’s books, and it shook up the children’s lit world when it went live. Surely, it wasn’t this bad?
After all, as a result of previous waves of feminism, authors such as Jane Yolen, Angela Carter, Tamora Pierce, Karen Cushman, etc. have been rewriting the patriarchal narratives of fairytales and folktales for decades. "Subversion became the battle cry: the tales were to be turned inside out and upside down" (Warner, 2016, p133). Surges of new children’s book authors continue to do the same.

However, as we write forward, we should examine how we rewrite these narratives. In empowering female protagonists, writers sometimes portray females still solidly stuck within the boundaries of a hegemonic value scale. Popular stories like Suzanne Collins’ The Hunger Games, Kristin Cashore’s Graceling, and Robin LaFevers’ Grave Mercy reverse the patriarchal narrative by featuring females as assassins—a habitually male archetype. (Note: I need to clarify that I am a fan of these books and think they may be a natural first step towards rewriting the patriarchy.) Female readers have embraced these portrayals as disruptive and validating (me included). Yet, we also need to acknowledge that this trope implies that for females to have agency, their roles must swing to a violent extreme. These female warriors send the message that their physical ability to overpower adversaries is a valid measure of their worth in what remains a male-dominated world.

Movies do it too. In Pixar’s Brave, she outperforms the men in a competition where she is offered as the prize. In the newest Snow White, not only does she not marry the prince, she dons full armor to defend her kingdom. In the latest Wonder Woman, she is strong because of her ability to outperform men in war.
I'm not saying we shouldn't write these roles, only that we should be aware of what we're writing. It takes more than switching the gender of a typically male archetype or story trope to make a story feminist. To truly unweave our deeply embedded societal and cultural narratives, we need to dig deeper. We need to define new ways of empowering our female protagonists. In Don’t Bet on the Prince, Jack Zipes suggests we consider how “stories might be rearranged or reutilised to counter the destructive tendencies of male-dominant values” (Zipes, 1987, p4).

To do this, we need to examine stereotypes that are so deeply embedded in our culture, we have lost sight of them. For instance, we need to beware archetypes for which characteristics in a male are considered good, yet in a female are considered exceptional or bad.

It’s the point of my Ph.D. study, “Tricksters, Witches, and Folk Tales: Rewriting the Patriarchal Narrative in Children’s Literature.” Tricksters are characters, such as Loki and Hermes in mythology, or Anansi, Coyote, and Jack in folklore. They are clever, crafty, witty manipulators—some even switch gender to create life—and they are mostly male. There are very few female tricksters. Instead, these same traits are negatively represented in the roles of witches, old crones, and evil queens. It is pervasive. In Sandra Billington's The Concept of the Goddess, Catharina Raudvere is quoted as saying, “the connection between women, sexuality and witchcraft appears to be a globally observed pattern” (Billington, 1999, p47, p52).

Strong women are demonized in a cultural narrative that suggests men prefer obedient, silent princesses, such as Snow White or Sleeping Beauty (victims of nonconsensual sexual advances). Warner stated that "the deep malice of the witches and evil stepmothers, the unrelieved spite of some sisters, and the murderous jealousy between mothers and daughters were left to stand, unchallenged. These portraits of female evil supported male interests, too. The tales were not merely symptoms but also instruments of a strategy: divide women against one another the better to lord it over them" (Warner, 2016, p133). As writers, are we feeding into this hegemony?

As the story makers, the creators of scripts that will shape and influence new generations, we should ask ourselves, 'What do strong, female characters look like on a feminist value scale'? As we craft our stories, let us consider the world in which our characters reside. Are we still making our women struggle in a patriarchal environment, thereby reinforcing that hegemonic system? Remember, “Who tells the story, who recasts the characters and changes the tone becomes very important: no story is ever the same as its source or model, the chemistry of narrator and audience changes it” (Warner, 1995, p418). We are the front line of embedded societal symbolism. Perhaps it's time we rewrite our cultural narrative.

References:
Billington, S., 1999. The concept of the Goddess. Routledge, London.
Dulemba, E., 2012. Lula’s Brew. Xist Publishing, Irvine, Calif.
Warner, M., 2016. Once Upon a Time: A Short History of Fairy Tale, Reprint edition. ed. OUP Oxford, Oxford.
Warner, M., 1995. From The Beast To The Blonde: On Fairy Tales and Their Tellers, New Ed edition.
     ed. Vintage, London.
Zipes, J. (Ed.), 1986. Don’t Bet on the Prince: Contemporary Feminist Fairy Tales in North America
     and England, 1 edition. ed. Routledge, New York London.